<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using an SSD with Full Disk Encryption—Benchmarks using PGP WDE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/</link>
	<description>Assistant Professor—Information Systems—Brigham Young University</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 21:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-236</guid>
		<description>You might want to try Truecrypt instead. It's very very fast and I see only a marginal difference between encrypted and non-encrypted drives.

Les</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to try Truecrypt instead. It&#8217;s very very fast and I see only a marginal difference between encrypted and non-encrypted drives.</p>
<p>Les</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Encrypting solid state disks &#124; c089</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Encrypting solid state disks &#124; c089</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-233</guid>
		<description>[...] March 2: There are other articles suggesting that an encrypted SSD is still much faster than a HDD. Also, Samsung seems to offer SSDs with real [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] March 2: There are other articles suggesting that an encrypted SSD is still much faster than a HDD. Also, Samsung seems to offer SSDs with real [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drei Gründe gegen SSDs im MacBook &#124; MacMacken</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Drei Gründe gegen SSDs im MacBook &#124; MacMacken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 02:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] verlieren durch Systemverschlüsselung wie beispielsweise mit Whole Disk Encryption (WDE) von PGP dramatisch an Geschwindigkeit. SSDs mit Hardware-basierter Verschlüsselung sind mir nicht [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] verlieren durch Systemverschlüsselung wie beispielsweise mit Whole Disk Encryption (WDE) von PGP dramatisch an Geschwindigkeit. SSDs mit Hardware-basierter Verschlüsselung sind mir nicht [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-213</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I'm looking forward to trying SSD's with hardware-based encryption. I think that is the answer of how to achieve full disk encryption without a significant performance hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I&#8217;m looking forward to trying SSD&#8217;s with hardware-based encryption. I think that is the answer of how to achieve full disk encryption without a significant performance hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slow Pain</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Slow Pain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-211</guid>
		<description>We evaluated McAfee FDE (Safeboot) with some 500+ € OCZ Vertex2 SSD's. The outcome was extremely disappointing: 
Read performance dropped 188-210 MB/sec to 45-50 MB/sec.
If you need to use FDE, don't throw your money away for the SSD hype... not until the FDE Software or SSD companies improved software/firmware for their stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We evaluated McAfee FDE (Safeboot) with some 500+ € OCZ Vertex2 SSD&#8217;s. The outcome was extremely disappointing:<br />
Read performance dropped 188-210 MB/sec to 45-50 MB/sec.<br />
If you need to use FDE, don&#8217;t throw your money away for the SSD hype&#8230; not until the FDE Software or SSD companies improved software/firmware for their stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Wieland</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Wieland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I'm not surprised the Seagate is slower with CheckPoint.  Seagate drives are notoriously slow with encryption, and mine was unusable when encrypted.  I wonder if anyone has benchmarks comparing PGP 10 with CheckPoint on a non-Seagate drive.  I've been using CheckPoint on my MacBook for almost a year, and I only see an 8% performance hit with CheckPoint.  Our enterprise information security group is evaluating PGP as a CheckPoint replacement (since it supports media encryption).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised the Seagate is slower with CheckPoint.  Seagate drives are notoriously slow with encryption, and mine was unusable when encrypted.  I wonder if anyone has benchmarks comparing PGP 10 with CheckPoint on a non-Seagate drive.  I&#8217;ve been using CheckPoint on my MacBook for almost a year, and I only see an 8% performance hit with CheckPoint.  Our enterprise information security group is evaluating PGP as a CheckPoint replacement (since it supports media encryption).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 01:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-207</guid>
		<description>I've got an OWC Pro RE SSD and it's also slow with WDE.

Anybody tried Check Point FDE to see what their performance is like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got an OWC Pro RE SSD and it&#8217;s also slow with WDE.</p>
<p>Anybody tried Check Point FDE to see what their performance is like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Nicholson</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Nicholson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2010 21:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-205</guid>
		<description>Were those times with version 10.0.2? They fixed somethings that improved performance on SSD's but I'm also seeing slow times with my MBP i7 with X-25M on WDE encrypted drives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were those times with version 10.0.2? They fixed somethings that improved performance on SSD&#8217;s but I&#8217;m also seeing slow times with my MBP i7 with X-25M on WDE encrypted drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Nice one, been looking for this.
Dont usually post comments, but just wanted to thank you for this one.
Probably not gonna have encryption on my SSD :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, been looking for this.<br />
Dont usually post comments, but just wanted to thank you for this one.<br />
Probably not gonna have encryption on my SSD <img src='http://anthonyvance.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Hall</title>
		<link>http://anthonyvance.com/blog/security/ssd_encryption/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anthonyvance.com/blog/?p=595#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Awesome data!  I've wondered about drive speeds (spindle vs SSD) and the impact of full disk encryption.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome data!  I&#8217;ve wondered about drive speeds (spindle vs SSD) and the impact of full disk encryption.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

